Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-21 Thread Aaron Bedra
On 01/21/2011 10:31 AM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: Please create a ticket in JIRA for this. If you have a patch and have signed the CA then all is good there. Done. http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-722 My CA is on file. Regards, BG Thanks! -- Cheers, Aaron Bedra -- Clojure/core http:

Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-21 Thread Baishampayan Ghose
> Please create a ticket in JIRA for this.  If you have a patch and have > signed the CA then all is good there. Done. http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-722 My CA is on file. Regards, BG -- Baishampayan Ghose b.ghose at gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-21 Thread Aaron Bedra
On 01/20/2011 07:53 AM, John Szakmeister wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value of the last s-expression.. but returns nil when the vector-of-seq-exprs is not empty.. may be this is the expected b

Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-20 Thread John Szakmeister
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: >>> when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value of >>> the last s-expression.. but returns nil when the >>> vector-of-seq-exprs is not empty.. may be this is the expected behaviour .. >>> but the documentation s

Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-20 Thread Baishampayan Ghose
>> when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value of >> the last s-expression.. but returns nil when the >> vector-of-seq-exprs is not empty.. may be this is the expected behaviour .. >> but the documentation states otherwise .. > > Yeah, that looks like a bug (either in th

Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-20 Thread Sunil S Nandihalli
yea true, I guess it is harmless though .. but a bug nevertheless... On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:06 PM, John Szakmeister wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli > wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value > of > > t

Re: just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-20 Thread John Szakmeister
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli wrote: > Hello everybody, > when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value of > the last s-expression.. but returns nil when the > vector-of-seq-exprs is not empty.. may be this is the expected behaviour .. > but the docu

just an observation about doseq...

2011-01-19 Thread Sunil S Nandihalli
Hello everybody, when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value of the last s-expression.. but returns nil when the vector-of-seq-exprs is not empty.. may be this is the expected behaviour .. but the documentation states otherwise .. Sunil. -- You received this message