Re: into-array without the extra seq

2016-05-11 Thread Alex Miller
I do not think we will extend into to support array sources. If your source is a vector, then vector seqs are actually really fast and into-array is probably not as bad as you think, however it won't apply the xf. into is just doing transduce internally though and transducers are agnostic to h

into-array without the extra seq

2016-05-11 Thread László Török
Hi, The other day I was trying to do an (into (long-array 0) xform some-vec) which doesn't work, then I realized there is *into-array* for that, however, it turns everything into a *seq* first. Is there any plans for extending *into* to hand primitive array, or rewriting *into-array* to do awa