Re: idiomatic way of creating a set of records

2008-08-25 Thread Parth Malwankar
On Aug 26, 12:08 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 25, 1:16 pm, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 25, 9:31 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Aug 23, 6:13 am, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 23, 12:23 am,

Re: idiomatic way of creating a set of records

2008-08-25 Thread Rich Hickey
On Aug 25, 1:16 pm, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 25, 9:31 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 23, 6:13 am, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Aug 23, 12:23 am, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1

Re: idiomatic way of creating a set of records

2008-08-25 Thread Chouser
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (defn- _update-employee-role [n r recs] ... > (defn- _delete-employee-by-name [n recs] ... I just renamed these in the wiki, as using underscores in function names is discouraged in Clojure. If you don't like the new

Re: idiomatic way of creating a set of records

2008-08-25 Thread Parth Malwankar
On Aug 25, 9:31 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 23, 6:13 am, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 23, 12:23 am, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Parth Malwankar > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Base

Re: idiomatic way of creating a set of records

2008-08-25 Thread Rich Hickey
On Aug 23, 6:13 am, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 23, 12:23 am, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Parth Malwankar > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Based on a recent thread on structures I am curious to know > > > what migh