Re: groovy builders equivalent

2010-02-08 Thread Laurent PETIT
2010/2/8 Sean Devlin : > Perhaps I have an incomplete grasp of the problem domain, but wouldn't > a map stored in a ref let you do this? I don't understand. > > On Feb 8, 9:12 am, Laurent PETIT wrote: >> 2010/2/8 Chouser : >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Laurent PETIT >> > wrote:

Re: groovy builders equivalent

2010-02-08 Thread Sean Devlin
Perhaps I have an incomplete grasp of the problem domain, but wouldn't a map stored in a ref let you do this? On Feb 8, 9:12 am, Laurent PETIT wrote: > 2010/2/8 Chouser : > > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Laurent PETIT > > wrote: > >> Hello, > > >> Did anybody create a functionally equi

Re: groovy builders equivalent

2010-02-08 Thread Laurent PETIT
2010/2/8 Chouser : > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Did anybody create a functionally equivalent clojure version of >> so-called Groovy Builders ? >> ( http://groovy.codehaus.org/Builders ) >> >> Not that it should be too difficult to come up with an equivalen

Re: groovy builders equivalent

2010-02-08 Thread Chouser
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > Hello, > > Did anybody create a functionally equivalent clojure version of > so-called Groovy Builders ? > ( http://groovy.codehaus.org/Builders ) > > Not that it should be too difficult to come up with an equivalent, and > also not that it wo

Re: groovy builders equivalent

2010-02-08 Thread Laurent PETIT
And I've found groovy builders not so well documented, very "magical" (as in "dark magic") where I think this should not be that way. So there is even room to make this simpler for the users, I guess, by correctly implementing a somewhat "verbose" purely functional (and macros-free) DSL, from whom

groovy builders equivalent

2010-02-08 Thread Laurent PETIT
Hello, Did anybody create a functionally equivalent clojure version of so-called Groovy Builders ? ( http://groovy.codehaus.org/Builders ) Not that it should be too difficult to come up with an equivalent, and also not that it would seem to you that it is interesting to do so given the power of c