count me as very interested too.
regards,
Ralph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send ema
On Feb 21, 2:03 pm, Dan Larkin wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, mikel wrote:
>
>
>
> > If there's interest in having models and generic functions in contrib,
> > I'll get a contributor agreement to Rich.
>
> Aye there is, from me at least.
I think about three people have expressed interes
I'm interested as well.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Dan Larkin wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, mikel wrote:
>
>
>
> If there's interest in having models and generic functions in contrib,
> I'll get a contributor agreement to Rich.
>
>
> Aye there is, from me at least.
>
>
>
> >
>
--
On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:23 PM, mikel wrote:
>
>
> If there's interest in having models and generic functions in contrib,
> I'll get a contributor agreement to Rich.
>
Aye there is, from me at least.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are s
On Feb 20, 9:39 pm, mikel wrote:
> Taking Chouser's suggestion of using a proxy that implements the
> IDeref interface, and overrides deref to provide access to a closed-
> over atom, I rewrote generic functions without resorting to gen-class
> or external Java files. That makes me happy; good
Taking Chouser's suggestion of using a proxy that implements the
IDeref interface, and overrides deref to provide access to a closed-
over atom, I rewrote generic functions without resorting to gen-class
or external Java files. That makes me happy; good suggestion, Chouser.
I made a couple of oth
