Thank for the link +2
I think that Java & C# languages (not the platforms) are not the
places for monads (or functional programming in that respect).
As for the "success" of ideas, not long ago functional languages them-
selfs were thought of as too academic for practical use (multicore
change all
Thanks for the link. I've tried and tried to understand monads, with
little success. It's lead me to the conclusion that monads won't
easily become one of the dominating approaches to program
organization. This is because, as the document says, without an
understanding of category theory, "it's li
http://patryshev.com/monad/crashcourse.pdf
(via SVP)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
