On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Peter Schuller
wrote:
>> I, however, have still been doing a more traditional
>> write/save/execute debugging workflow without the REPL, which doesn't
>> seem to get the real benefits of the REPL. From what I understand,
>> when you take full advantage of the REP
You mention one use case of the repl, but I think that's just one part
of a typical workflow. Say you decide to write a function, you start
half way and then you realize that you need to group pairs of items in
a vector and then turn these pairs into a vector of maps. Oh, but
what order are the a
I never used emacs but in some videos I sah people doing cool stuff in
it. So I started learning. I'm still a noob but I really like it
already better then any IDE I have used. It makes working with the
repl easy.
On Jul 28, 1:49 am, Josh Stratton wrote:
> > If you're rather looking for overall w
> If you're rather looking for overall workflows/program structure/best
> practices etc - good question. :)
I was actually, but the integration with emacs is important, too.
I'll have to get SLIME working.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clo
Josh Stratton wrote:
> Are there any tutorials specific to developing and debugging large
> clojure apps through the REPL?
While some people seem to really love going through the REPL all the
time, personally I prefer something a little more integrated with my
editor. I use the above mentioned swa
> I, however, have still been doing a more traditional
> write/save/execute debugging workflow without the REPL, which doesn't
> seem to get the real benefits of the REPL. From what I understand,
> when you take full advantage of the REPL, you can quickly tweak things
> in the code like if a funct
I think one of the major advantages touted by languages like clojure
are faster development times by adding to the program as you go via
the REPL.
I, however, have still been doing a more traditional
write/save/execute debugging workflow without the REPL, which doesn't
seem to get the real benefit
