Hi Jay
yep, with 2.0.7, everything works just fine now. BTW: I still consider this
a very quick response time wich is highly appreciated.
Ported all my (thousands of) tests over with no more issues.
Ciao
...Jochen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Gr
Jochen (and anyone else affected by this): Sorry, took me a few days,
but I've released 2.0.7, which fixes all the bugs reported above.
Cheers, Jay
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Jay Fields wrote:
> Thanks for all the examples, I'll look today at getting these fixed up.
>
>
> On Thursday, Marc
Thanks for all the examples, I'll look today at getting these fixed up.
On Thursday, March 13, 2014, Jochen wrote:
> Hi Jay
>
> unfortunately I found another one, again on AssertionErrors but this time
> with for-each:
> (expect AssertionError (from-each [a [1 2]] (assert (string? a ;; a
Hi Jay
unfortunately I found another one, again on AssertionErrors but this time
with for-each:
(expect AssertionError (from-each [a [1 2]] (assert (string? a ;; all
pass as intended
(expect AssertionError (from-each [a [1 "2"]] (assert (string? a ;;
still all pass but should signal
Looks great! thanks for sharing
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Jochen wrote:
> Hi Jay...
>
> thanks for all the great new features.
>
> There is just one strangeness I have, exceptions seem not to work with
> more->, but did with given.
> E.g.
> (expect (more-> false identity
>
Hi Jay...
thanks for all the great new features.
There is just one strangeness I have, exceptions seem not to work with
more->, but did with given.
E.g.
(expect (more-> false identity
AssertionError assert)
false)
fails with reporting
>> failure in ( sample_test.clj:4
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 2:53:09 PM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> Since `given` was a relatively simple macro, we added it to
> worldsingles.util.test and switched all our test namespaces to refer given
> from there instead, and then upgraded to Expectations 2.0.6. Seems to have
> gone smo
Since `given` was a relatively simple macro, we added it to
worldsingles.util.test and switched all our test namespaces to refer given from
there instead, and then upgraded to Expectations 2.0.6. Seems to have gone
smoothly.
Love the new DSL features!
Sean
On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Sean Co
Looks great Jay - as you know I'm a big fan of Expectations.
One big issue I see here is that by removing 'given' you've made adoption of
2.0 a bit "all or nothing": to use 2.0, I must update our entire test base to
rewrite all 'given' tests using the new syntax.
Is there an intermediate versio
expectations is a minimilist's unit testing framework
website: http://jayfields.com/expectations/
github: https://github.com/jaycfields/expectations
changelog: https://github.com/jaycfields/expectations/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
some large changes that will hopefully result in even more concise a
10 matches
Mail list logo
