On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:01:16 AM UTC-5, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
> Then it seems that i have completely misunderstood the point of that
> paragraph - it may be worth rewording it.
> Anyway, thanks for explanation. Best,
> Janek
>
Could be changed to: "It endeavors to be a general-purpos
Then it seems that i have completely misunderstood the point of that
paragraph - it may be worth rewording it.
Anyway, thanks for explanation. Best,
Janek
W dniu środa, 26 lutego 2014 15:20:08 UTC+1 użytkownik Fogus napisał:
>
> I do believe that the sentence is correct as written. That is,
>
I think "not" isn't missing. ;-)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Janek Warchoł <
lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On clojure.org/rationale there is a sentence
>
> It endeavors to be a general-purpose language suitable in those areas
>> where Java is suitable
>
>
> It seems
I do believe that the sentence is correct as written. That is,
Clojure strives to solve the same kinds of problems that Java is
typically used to solve.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Janek Warchoł
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On clojure.org/rationale there is a sentence
>
>> It endeavors to be a gener
Hello,
On clojure.org/rationale there is a sentence
It endeavors to be a general-purpose language suitable in those areas where
> Java is suitable
It seems that a "not" is missing at the end.
best,
Janek Warchoł
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups