On Nov 5, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
>
> If I understand well, you are re-def'ing the var. If so, then no
> problem, because you have mistaken "redefinition of a var" for
> "dynamic rebinding of a var".
>
> redefinition of a var will still be possible for non dynamically
> rebindable
Hello Lee,
2010/11/5 Lee Spector :
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
>> * code path for using vars is now *much* faster for the common case,
>> and you must explicitly ask for :dynamic bindability
>
> This has been bouncing around in my head for the last week or so,
>
On Oct 25, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> * code path for using vars is now *much* faster for the common case,
> and you must explicitly ask for :dynamic bindability
This has been bouncing around in my head for the last week or so, occasionally
colliding with the memory of Rich
