What are you going to do about:
default public constructor?
The JAX-WS tools don't really care if javac generates a default
constructor or if Clojure does. The deftype constructor with no fields
defined is:
public com.example.FooBarService();
which -- assuming it calls super() and ini
On Apr 27, 10:00 pm, Richard Newman wrote:
> Further to IRC conversations:
>
> I'm attempting to generate a JAX-WS service using Clojure. The main
> stumbling block was annotations; that's been removed, so I gave it a
> shot using deftype.
>
> My first strike works code-wise, so I sent it to
On Apr 28, 5:00 am, Richard Newman wrote:
> Opinions, thoughts, critiques, "you're insane"s, etc. welcome.
The patches look fine to me and the change is well justified since you
have a real use case. I don't think restricting deftype to final
classes would serve any real purpose. I'd just go a
Further to IRC conversations:
I'm attempting to generate a JAX-WS service using Clojure. The main
stumbling block was annotations; that's been removed, so I gave it a
shot using deftype.
My first strike works code-wise, so I sent it to the list earlier today.
When it comes to actually inte
