> Spaghetti code ?
most definitely. use it a lot and you'll almost certainly end up with
a "big ball of mud".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new mem
On Apr 24, 3:33 am, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:17 AM, George Jahad
>
> Is there a reason for all the conversion to string and back?
severe lack of "hammock driven development"?
the "clojure.core" is also redundant within syntax-quote, making it:
(defmacro remote-declare [n]
2011/4/24 George Jahad
> so as Rich mentions in hacker news, you can get declare to work in
> other namespaces which does convert the circular dependencies issue
> from a compile time problem to a potential run-time one.
>
> The definition is pretty much what you would expect:
>
> (defmacro remot
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:17 AM, George Jahad
wrote:
> so as Rich mentions in hacker news, you can get declare to work in
> other namespaces which does convert the circular dependencies issue
> from a compile time problem to a potential run-time one.
>
> The definition is pretty much what you woul
so as Rich mentions in hacker news, you can get declare to work in
other namespaces which does convert the circular dependencies issue
from a compile time problem to a potential run-time one.
The definition is pretty much what you would expect:
(defmacro remote-declare [name]
"declares the supp
