`vector` is now inlined in master, should be >10X faster for (vector 1)
David
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:38 PM, kovas boguta wrote:
> I'm trying to optimize zippers for clojurescript. My benchmark is
> implementing the combinator systems from
>
> https://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/page-102
Yes Closure is smart enough to remove code that doesn't do anything. Try
with :simple and :static-fns true
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, kovas boguta wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:36 PM, kovas boguta
> >
> wrote:
>
> > There also seems to be some issue with laziness, where some of my big
>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:36 PM, kovas boguta wrote:
> There also seems to be some issue with laziness, where some of my big
> list operations are getting a 0 as well.
Alright I managed to figure out my laziness issue, but the thing with
records is still a head-scratcher...
--
--
You received
Some good news and some puzzling news.
With advanced mode, the various forms of non-literal vector creation
clock in around 400msec for 1 million ops on node, which is a 2-to-5x
improvement.
Now, the puzzling bit:
Using time, I get a big fat 0 for certain kinds of operations:
(time (dotimes [x
I've just updated benchmark dependencies to reflect latest changes in
ClojureScript. Keywords are little slower than before but otherwise there
are no big differences.
JW
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 5:04:26 AM UTC+1, kovasb wrote:
>
> FYI,
>
> http://wagjo.github.io/benchmark-cljs/
>
> has
Yes no benchmarking with anything other than advanced please - lots of
optimizations kick in only for :advanced, especially around various forms
of function invocation, :simple + :static-fns true will also give
reasonable results however it'll mess with REPL interactivity.
David
On Tue, Nov 5, 2
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:05 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> Also what optimization settings are you using?
I guess I should try something other than the browser repl. Will retry
with advanced optimizations.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" gr
This is really cool, would love to have something like this combined with
graphs like the old ClojureScript benchmarks where we tracked based on git
commit for the major JS engines.
David
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:04 PM, kovas boguta wrote:
> FYI,
>
> http://wagjo.github.io/benchmark-cljs/
>
>
If anything is an order of magnitude slower than Clojure it should be
considered a bug and be filed as such. We're shooting for w/in 2.5X for all
operations.
`vector` is slow and can easily be dramatically improved. I suspect there's
something up with record creation and it should be looked into.
FYI,
http://wagjo.github.io/benchmark-cljs/
has some interesting cljs perf comparisons for various datastructures,
for those who haven't seen it.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:38 PM, kovas boguta wrote:
> I'm trying to optimize zippers for clojurescript. My benchmark is
> implementing the combina
I'm trying to optimize zippers for clojurescript. My benchmark is
implementing the combinator systems from
https://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/page-102
which heavily stress both navigating and modifying the tree.
A major hotspot seems to be data structure creation time, which can be
between
11 matches
Mail list logo
