thanks David.
Sunil.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:49 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Sunil Nandihalli <
> sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thats really nice to hear.. but is the version on clojars compatible
>> with 1.2 yet?
>> Thanks
>> Sunil.
>
>
> I fixed the
Thank you, thank you, thank you for making this happen (and your Vimeo
talks)!
-ck
On May 25, 12:19 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Sunil Nandihalli <
>
> sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thats really nice to hear.. but is the version on clojars compatible
> >
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Sunil Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thats really nice to hear.. but is the version on clojars compatible
> with 1.2 yet?
> Thanks
> Sunil.
I fixed the 1.2 vs 1.3 numerics issue with the help of the Clojure/core
team. The version on Github as
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Sunil Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thats really nice to hear.. but is the version on clojars compatible
> with 1.2 yet?
> Thanks
> Sunil.
I actually spoke a tiny bit too soon. There's one bug related to the
numerics change between 1.2 and 1
Thats really nice to hear.. but is the version on clojars compatible
with 1.2 yet?
Thanks
Sunil.
On May 25, 9:03 am, David Nolen wrote:
> I know not everyone is adventurous enough to use the 1.3.0 alphas just to
> try out core.logic. I've made the required changes to make it 1.2.0
> compatible.
>
I know not everyone is adventurous enough to use the 1.3.0 alphas just to
try out core.logic. I've made the required changes to make it 1.2.0
compatible.
Have fun,
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send emai
