Thanks all - I appreciate the thoughts.
--
paul.butcher->msgCount++
Silverstone, Brands Hatch, Donington Park...
Who says I have a one track mind?
http://www.paulbutcher.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher
Skype: paulrabutcher
On 1 Jan 2014, at 05:46, Timothy Baldridge wro
A few other things that might help:
1) you can use (put! c val) from inside any function. Sometimes if you want
to fire and forget a send, that might be the best option
2) you can wrap the code inside the sub fns inside another go. This isn't
as slow as you might think
3) think about using core.
It should work if it's inlined or a macro. It won't shrink foo's generated
code size any if bar is a macro, but it will split up the source code into
smaller pieces if that's all you're concerned about.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Paul Butcher wrote:
> I recently discovered that parking ca
I would say use macros to avoid
hiding calls from the go macro
scope.
Luc P.
> I recently discovered that parking calls only work if they're directly
> contained within a go block. So this works fine:
>
> (defn foo [ch]
> (go
> (
> But this:
>
> (defn bar [ch]
> (
> (defn foo [ch]
>
I recently discovered that parking calls only work if they're directly
contained within a go block. So this works fine:
(defn foo [ch]
(go
(msgCount++
Silverstone, Brands Hatch, Donington Park...
Who says I have a one track mind?
http://www.paulbutcher.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.c
