On Jan 27, 2016 1:57 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Timothy Baldridge
wrote:
>>
>> It seems to me that there has to be a simpler approach to what you are
trying to accomplish. To that end, what is your end goal, and why is
"splitting the cljs into a .cljs fil
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Timothy Baldridge
wrote:
> It seems to me that there has to be a simpler approach to what you are
> trying to accomplish. To that end, what is your end goal, and why is
> "splitting
> the cljs into a .cljs file is not an option"?
>
The end goal is a unified lang
It seems to me that there has to be a simpler approach to what you are
trying to accomplish. To that end, what is your end goal, and why is "splitting
the cljs into a .cljs file is not an option"?
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Matc
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Matching Socks
wrote:
> Is lein's project mavenry important here? Could you call cljs.compiler
> directly?
>
You mean instead of using 'lein cljsbuild auto'? I can do that but I'm not
sure how to "link" the cljs core lib. Following David Nolen's excellent
hell
Is lein's project mavenry important here? Could you call cljs.compiler
directly?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
I have some cljs fn forms embedded in some clj code. Macros read the
stuff, munge it a bit, season to taste and generate cljs code.
At least that's the idea. Mixing clj and cljs is a requirement, so
splitting the cljs into a .cljs file is not an option. I'm not sure how
best to make it work, th
