That’s what I needed! Thanks
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:15 PM gsnewmark wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, similar issue was recently discussed on the
> Clojurians Slack (direct link -
> https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/clojure-spec/p146738221722 ,
> archive link -
> https://clojurians-log.clo
If I'm not mistaken, similar issue was recently discussed on the
Clojurians Slack (direct link -
https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/clojure-spec/p146738221722 ,
archive link -
https://clojurians-log.clojureverse.org/clojure-spec/2016-07-01.html -
discussion starts from @ghadi's post at
I ran into this same issue while trying to spec Clojure's destructuring
language. I asked a question about this on Stack Overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/38151446/5044950
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 9:16:40 AM UTC-4, Nikita Prokopov wrote:
>
> Imagine I have a generic keyword => string map w
Imagine I have a generic keyword => string map with a special key that
stores a number:
{ ::count 7
:x "x"
:y "y"
:z "z"
... }
Both cases are easy to validate on their own:
(s/def ::count number?)
(s/conform (s/keys ::count) { ::count 7 })
(s/conform (s/map-of keyword? string?) { :x "x
