On 3 February 2010 17:14, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
> I believe it's also possible to make the change backward compatible so
> arguments to the new require macro would work quoted or not. (by detecting
> and ignoring (quote ...) special forms in arguments).
That's a good idea! A simple-minded m
On Feb 3, 10:06 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 8:40 pm, Stuart Halloway wrote:
>
> > SS: is require* an acceptable name for the function version?
>
> I don't care what it's called so long as there's a function there.
> While we're at it, I want import* back as a function.
>
> -SS
Out of
On Feb 2, 8:40 pm, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> SS: is require* an acceptable name for the function version?
I don't care what it's called so long as there's a function there.
While we're at it, I want import* back as a function.
-SS
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
On Feb 2, 2010, at 8:40 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> In teaching people Clojure, non-intuitive behavior with use/require is the #1
> problem for beginners, by a mile. I believe we need both ordinary function
> and macro versions, and I am pretty sure that a well-considered patch
> implementing
In teaching people Clojure, non-intuitive behavior with use/require is
the #1 problem for beginners, by a mile. I believe we need both
ordinary function and macro versions, and I am pretty sure that a well-
considered patch implementing this would be accepted.
SS: is require* an acceptable n
On 2 February 2010 16:05, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
>> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
>> parens.
>
> Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not
And of course, that *does* work, thus my complaint was moot, and the
symbol non-resolution was probably what Stuart was so aghast about
(even though it wasn't my point).
As Michael said: I wish I'd realised that just before posting rather
than just after :)
On Feb 2, 10:50 am, ataggart wrote:
And of course that should be (require '[clojure.contrib string io]) or
(require ['clojure.contrib 'string 'io]) so the symbols don't try to
get resolved.
On Feb 2, 10:41 am, ataggart wrote:
> On Feb 2, 7:05 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>
> > On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>
> > > On a related n
On Feb 2, 7:05 am, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>
> > On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
> > require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
> > parens.
>
> Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not
On 2 February 2010 17:36, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 2 February 2010 17:05, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>>> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
>>> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
>>> parens.
>>
>> Absolut
On 2 February 2010 17:05, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
>> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
>> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
>> parens.
>
> Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not
On Feb 1, 9:23 pm, OGINO Masanori wrote:
> Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
For now, yes, as ataggart showed. But I expect names in contrib will
be in flux for the next few weeks, so you should probably pick a
release and stick with it.
-SS
--
You received this
On Feb 2, 2:46 am, ataggart wrote:
> On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
> require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
> parens.
Absolutely not! Having 'require' as an ordinary function (not a
macro) is important for code-generating code.
-SS
-
Thank you. I try to use use function and it works, too.
--
Name: OGINO Masanori (荻野 雅紀)
E-mail: masanori.og...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On a related note, it is my sincere hope that we get a version of
require and use which no longer require (ha!) the use of quoted
parens. Thankfully the ns macro will work with solely nested vectors.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
T
On Feb 1, 6:23 pm, OGINO Masanori wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I built master branch of clojure and clojure-contrib and then I found
> that there is no duck-streams. io exists.
>
> Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
>
> FYI, I want something like this Python code in Clojure
Hello.
I built master branch of clojure and clojure-contrib and then I found
that there is no duck-streams. io exists.
Can I write a code on both 1.1 and master using duck-streams/io?
FYI, I want something like this Python code in Clojure:
try:
from clojure.contrib.io import reader
17 matches
Mail list logo
