Not really, as the lookups will happen at macroexpansion time and not at
runtime. It should be as efficient as a normal (case ...).
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Paul Butcher wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2013, at 16:34, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>
> To do it with case, you'd need to wrap case in a macro
On 30 Dec 2013, at 16:34, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> To do it with case, you'd need to wrap case in a macro that expanded to
> `(case ~thingy ~(eval case1) ...) or something along those lines
Thanks, but I suspect that that might be another way of saying "use condp" :-)
Cheers,
--
paul.butcher-
To do it with case, you'd need to wrap case in a macro that expanded to
`(case ~thingy ~(eval case1) ...) or something along those lines, with the
evals snapping lookups like FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED to the
associated constants. This will have the effect of classloading the class
with th
On 30 Dec 2013, at 13:57, Nicola Mometto wrote:
> The test clauses of case expressions are not evaluated, so that case is
> trying to "match" the symbol 'FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED, not
> the value of FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED.
Ah - I was aware of the requirement for the const
The test clauses of case expressions are not evaluated, so that case is
trying to "match" the symbol 'FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED, not
the value of FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED.
Paul Butcher writes:
> I'm sure I'm missing something very simple here, but I'm damned if I can see
>
I'm sure I'm missing something very simple here, but I'm damned if I can see it.
I'm trying to use the Java Rome RSS/Atom utility library from Clojure. The Rome
Fetcher library defines a FeedEvent class, which among other things defines a
number of static final string members:
https://github.co
