On Dec 22, 12:39 am, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> But I (the individual) agree, modulo a proper overloading pattern to
> afford minimal overhead for the two-argument form.
You mean like:
(defn bit-or
([] 0)
([x] x)
([x y] (clojure.lang.Numbers/or x y))
([x y & rest]
(reduce #(clojure.
On Sunday 21 December 2008 15:14, ntu...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Why do "bit-or" and "bit-and" only accept 2 arguments? "or" and "and"
> accept an arbitrary number and I think it is useful to modifiy "bit-
> or" and "bit-and" to accept 2 or more, for example:
>
> (defn my-bit-or [x y & rest]
> (
Why do "bit-or" and "bit-and" only accept 2 arguments? "or" and "and"
accept an arbitrary number and I think it is useful to modifiy "bit-
or" and "bit-and" to accept 2 or more, for example:
(defn my-bit-or [x y & rest]
(reduce #(clojure.lang.Numbers/or %1 %2) (list* x y rest)))
What does the
