On Aug 25, 11:28 am, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 16:24, Licenser wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> > JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
> > much easier to represent data str
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 16:24, Licenser wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
> much easier to represent data structures in. I know XML is a buzzword,
> but JSON is on it's
> Hi everyone,
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON.
>
> …
>
> Or do I miss something that makes it important for Clojure to be
> bundled so tightly with XML?
Where did you get the idea that Clojure is tightly bundled with XML?
It uses XML for the build sc
Hi,
On Aug 25, 4:24 pm, Licenser wrote:
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
> much easier to represent data structures in. I know XML is a buzzword,
> but JSON is on it's way to become one too
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Licenser wrote:
>
> I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
> JSON.
I don't think Clojure has standardized in any way on XML. There just happens
to be an XML parsing lib in Clojure proper because it's a useful thing to
have. There is
Hi everyone,
I wonder what is the reason clojure uses XML standard wise and not
JSON. In the past I've found that JSON is much cleaner to read, and
much easier to represent data structures in. I know XML is a buzzword,
but JSON is on it's way to become one too. And yes I know Java uses
XML extensi
