Re: Vimclojure Performance on Windows

2010-03-16 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:01:38PM +, Emeka wrote: > Is Vimclojure stable enough to have it on my Window's Vista? I tried it out > before without success. I have a stable setup on Windows XP. I can't tell for Vista but I would not expect any problems beyond the usual Windows annoyances.

Re: Vimclojure Performance on Windows

2010-03-16 Thread Emeka
Meikel, Is Vimclojure stable enough to have it on my Window's Vista? I tried it out before without success. Regards, Emeka On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 25, 4:46 pm, Vitaly Peressada wrote: > > > Installed vimclojure-2.1.2 on Windows XP SP3. Have d

Re: Vimclojure Performance on Windows

2010-02-26 Thread Vitaly Peressada
Thanks for quick response. I will use vimclojure google group in the future. Since I am the first to report the problem it is likely that it might be machine/vim setup specific. I will repeat on different machine then. On Feb 26, 1:22 am, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 25, 4:46 pm, Vit

Re: Vimclojure Performance on Windows

2010-02-25 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On Feb 25, 4:46 pm, Vitaly Peressada wrote: > Installed vimclojure-2.1.2 on Windows XP SP3. Have dual-core machine > and 4GB of RAM. In VimRepl > (println "Hello World") takes about 10 seconds. Is this expected? No. Vim shells out to another process. This is the only real portable and stabl

Vimclojure Performance on Windows

2010-02-25 Thread Vitaly Peressada
Installed vimclojure-2.1.2 on Windows XP SP3. Have dual-core machine and 4GB of RAM. In VimRepl (println "Hello World") takes about 10 seconds. Is this expected? Any suggestions how to speed this up? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To