>
> You can probably also avoid the 60- to 80-second wait if you call
> (shutdown-agents) at the end of your program.
>
My program is endless =)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegrou
You can probably also avoid the 60- to 80-second wait if you call
(shutdown-agents) at the end of your program.
https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/future
Andy
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Max Muranov wrote:
> it takes about a minute for the pool to decide to shutdown the threads.
>>
>
>
Everything tbc++ said,
But also, if you create futures at a faster rate then they terminate, you
will eventually run out of memory, because futures are unbounded. If that's
the case, you want to use ThreadPoolExecutor to create a bounded pool or a
pool backed by a queue and then use it as expla
Every thread created on the JVM takes about 2MB of memory. Multiply that by
that number of threads, and I'm surprised your memory usage is that low.
But the futures thread pool will also re-use previously created threads for
new futures. In order to optimize this, a certain number of threads will b
