As I understand it, generics aren't "real" types in the JVM. They
don't even exist in the compiled bytecode instructions. They're more
like casting hints to the compiler. When you write List in
Java, what you get is more like a List that automatically
casts elements to Long when you retrieve th
> user=> (show Class)
> === public final java.lang.Class ===
> [ 0] static forName : Class (String)
> [ 1] static forName : Class (String,boolean,ClassLoader)
> [ 2] asSubclass : Class (Class)
> [...]
> nil
> user=> (show Class 2)
> # java.la
On May 28, 2009, at 5:23 PM, tsuraan wrote:
I have a java class whose constructor expects (among other things) a
BlockingQueue. It's easy to create a BlockingQueue in clojure
(obviously), but I can't figure out the syntax to specialize it to the
Long type. Is this possible, or does it even ma
Hi,
Am 28.05.2009 um 23:23 schrieb tsuraan:
I have a java class whose constructor expects (among other things) a
BlockingQueue. It's easy to create a BlockingQueue in clojure
(obviously), but I can't figure out the syntax to specialize it to the
Long type. Is this possible, or does it even ma
I have a java class whose constructor expects (among other things) a
BlockingQueue. It's easy to create a BlockingQueue in clojure
(obviously), but I can't figure out the syntax to specialize it to the
Long type. Is this possible, or does it even make sense? I seem to
recall that generics are j
