ield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
> --
> *From:* clo...@googlegroups.com >
Even though evaluation and realization of sequences is lazy, they cache
their result after evaluation. If you consume an object from the `sequence`
function more than once, the work is only done once. Sequences are iterable
and reducible, but not as efficiently because of the caching and because
ing somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
From: clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of Jonathon
McKitrick
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 6:32:54 AM
To: Clojure
Subject: Transducers eduction vs sequence
I have a `get-summary` function that
I have a `get-summary` function that builds stats and returns them as a web
service. Under the hood, it calls quite a few map, group-by, filter, etc.
functions.
I’m experimenting with transducers, and `sequence xform` does the trick
most of the time. But I want to understand `eduction` use case
