On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Juergen Gmeiner wrote:
>
>> I don't think it would be a good idea to print out the coll in every
>> case - after all, it might be some
>> huge Java collection that somehow is not seq-able. But for
>> jav
On May 13, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Juergen Gmeiner wrote:
I don't think it would be a good idea to print out the coll in every
case - after all, it might be some
huge Java collection that somehow is not seq-able. But for
java.lang.Named this should be quite safe.
Discussion?
I like it a lot.
--
Hello everybody,
sometimes the error messages from the compiler can be quite cryptic.
This is nothing serious or ground-breaking, but I thought maybe it
would be
a good idea if we got clojure to tell us which symbol is incorrect?
So I had a look at the code and it turns out this particular error
