On Jan 30, 4:35 pm, ataggart wrote:
> Akin to what Johann said, why bother with the functions that deal with
> the value/state? Put another way, the cell has identity over time,
> thus implemented as a ref. A function that, say, prints a cell, should
> take a cell/ref as its arg.
This is my gener
Akin to what Johann said, why bother with the functions that deal with
the value/state? Put another way, the cell has identity over time,
thus implemented as a ref. A function that, say, prints a cell, should
take a cell/ref as its arg.
Probably more than you need, but I highly recommend Rich's ta
How about Cell?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
Johann Hibschman wrote:
Does anyone have style suggestions for distinguishing the states from
the refs to mutable data?
Let's say I'm manipulating a cell in a lattice, or doing dynamic
programming, or something. In any case, I have a cell.
;; Current convention: use "cell-" as the type of the s
Does anyone have style suggestions for distinguishing the states from
the refs to mutable data?
Let's say I'm manipulating a cell in a lattice, or doing dynamic
programming, or something. In any case, I have a cell.
;; Current convention: use "cell-" as the type of the state of a
"cell".
(defstru
