Hi again,
Am 27.06.2009 um 11:59 schrieb Meikel Brandmeyer:
There is now constructor, like [] or {}.
Just use c.l.PersistentQueue/EMPTY.
I meant: there is _no_ constructor
Sincerely
Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi,
Am 27.06.2009 um 02:27 schrieb samppi:
Mr. Brandmeyer
You can call me Meikel, I guess. ;)
What might also be interesting if you want to
insert at one end and take out at the other
is clojure.lang.PersistentQueue.
conj will insert at the front and pop/peek will
work at the end. There is
Thanks for the replies. Mr. Brandmeyer's solution is exactly what I
needed; I don't really want to change rep+'s return value from a
vector, which would sort of break backwards compatibility.
On Jun 26, 8:25 am, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.06.2009 um 17:09 schrieb samppi:
>
> > @Mr.
On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:09 AM, samppi wrote:
I'm considering changing rep+'s documentation to state that it will
return a "collection" rather than a "vector", and then just use cons
without vec.
You might also consider describing it as a "seq". If you use "cons",
the object returned will be
Hi,
Am 26.06.2009 um 17:09 schrieb samppi:
@Mr. Gilardi, this is for a one-time only thing. I have a function,
called rep*, that builds up a vector from left to right. Another,
separate function, called rep+, calls rep*, but it needs to slip in an
element at the vector's beginning.
Maybe you
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
@Mr. Gilardi, this is for a one-time only thing. I have a function,
called rep*, that builds up a vector from left to right. Another,
separate function, called rep+, calls rep*, but it needs to slip in an
element at the vector's beginning.
I'm considering changi
On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:44 PM, arasoft wrote:
This also works:
(into [-1] [0 1 2 3 4])
but I am more than uncertain whether it is "proper".
Generally, the need to insert at the beginning of a vector should
trigger some close scrutiny as to whether vector is the right data
type to use in thi
This also works:
(into [-1] [0 1 2 3 4])
but I am more than uncertain whether it is "proper".
On Jun 25, 12:26 am, CuppoJava wrote:
> I personally use (concat [-1] [0 1 2 3 4]), but I've never been happy
> with that either. I would be interested in the proper way of doing
> this also.
> -Patri
I personally use (concat [-1] [0 1 2 3 4]), but I've never been happy
with that either. I would be interested in the proper way of doing
this also.
-Patrick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" g
Currently, if I want to do this: (mystery-fn [0 1 2 3 4] -1) -> [-1 0
1 2 3 4]), I use vec and cons: (vec (cons a-vec obj-to-insert)). Is
there a better way?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" gr
10 matches
Mail list logo