Ok. Thank you. Not quite what I was expecting but nice to see that tool too.
On Friday, 29 April 2016 20:45:27 UTC+2, Michael Willis wrote:
>
> The convention that I've seen among the Clojure community is to represent
> these kinds of things as data structures, and define your contraints using
The convention that I've seen among the Clojure community is to represent
these kinds of things as data structures, and define your contraints using
something like https://github.com/plumatic/schema
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 1:10:29 PM UTC-5, Olek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Clojure data structures ca
Hi!
Clojure data structures can express tree data structures, same as in XML
what is ideal for DSL. Especially that thanks to macros you can also change
the evaluation order and hide execution complexity and treat DSL in terms
of declarations and not statements nor functions. What is more the g
