Re: STM criticism from Azul Systems

2008-08-25 Thread Rich Hickey
On Aug 23, 7:28 pm, Tom Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this is a very old thread, but I think the composition question > deserves a better answer. > > cliffc wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > Ok, the long sought after counter example.: STM's do not compose w/ > > correctness. > > Bad Java

Re: STM criticism from Azul Systems

2008-08-24 Thread Raoul Duke
> Off topic, I'm keen to see if I can integrate Clojure's STM > implementation with CAL (http://openquark.org) -- I have already > written an STM implementation for it, (http://diversions.nfshost.com/ > blog/2008/03/27/a-cal-webapp-with-persistent-data-using-gwt-stm-and- > bdb/) but while I think