On Sep 17, 2:55 pm, Chouser wrote:
> In a new thread, vars always start with their root binding.
>
> There's an ongoing discussion about the best way to provide
> other options when this is not the desired behavior:
>
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets/170-bound-fn-macro
That discu
Yes, that would work. I keep forgetting the try finally acts like
unwind-protect. Even if the thread is killed the finally process will
execute. Ehh...
On Sep 17, 5:50 pm, John Harrop wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Gorsal wrote:
> > Or maybe i could simply push to the global var and
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Gorsal wrote:
> Or maybe i could simply push to the global var and in addition to the
> value use a unique gensymed id. Then once the local binding was done
> it would pop until it sees its gensymed id. That would work in the
> situation that a local binding faile
Or maybe i could simply push to the global var and in addition to the
value use a unique gensymed id. Then once the local binding was done
it would pop until it sees its gensymed id. That would work in the
situation that a local binding failed to pop its own binding. That
might work...
On Sep 17,
Thanks for the replies!
Before I start doing something silly, I would like to ask another
question. The eventual goal of all of this is to establish bindings
which also affect the same global variable in other namespaces (these
other namespaces will 100% have the same global variable). In other
wo
On Sep 17, 7:33 pm, Gorsal wrote:
> Basically i need to redefine the meaning of a special form. While i am
> willing to change the name for things like ns to defpackage, i am not
> willing to change the name of forms like apply and defn to achieve my
> goals. Instead, i would like to redefine t
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 12:40 pm, Gorsal wrote:
> > Oh. And just as a quick other question, do global bindings affect
> > threads which are started in the same ns?
>
> I think threads inherit the bindings in effect when they are created.
http://cloju
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 12:40 pm, Gorsal wrote:
>> Oh. And just as a quick other question, do global bindings affect
>> threads which are started in the same ns?
>
> I think threads inherit the bindings in effect when they are created.
They do not, o
2009/9/17 Laurent PETIT
>
> 2009/9/17 Stuart Sierra
>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 12:40 pm, Gorsal wrote:
>> > Oh. And just as a quick other question, do global bindings affect
>> > threads which are started in the same ns?
>>
>> I think threads inherit the bindings in effect when they are created.
>>
>
>
2009/9/17 Stuart Sierra
>
> On Sep 17, 12:40 pm, Gorsal wrote:
> > Oh. And just as a quick other question, do global bindings affect
> > threads which are started in the same ns?
>
> I think threads inherit the bindings in effect when they are created.
>
I would not place 1€ on this assumption
On Sep 17, 12:40 pm, Gorsal wrote:
> Oh. And just as a quick other question, do global bindings affect
> threads which are started in the same ns?
I think threads inherit the bindings in effect when they are created.
-SS
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this me
On Sep 17, 12:33 pm, Gorsal wrote:
> Basically i need to redefine the meaning of a special form.
This depends on what you want to redefine. True "special forms" in
Clojure -- def if do let quote var fn loop recur throw try . new set!
-- cannot be redefined, period.
Anything else -- the content
Oh. And just as a quick other question, do global bindings affect
threads which are started in the same ns?
Like
(binding [*global* 2]
(with-thread
(print *global*) ;;prints 2???
))
On Sep 17, 11:33 am, Gorsal wrote:
> Basically i need to redefine the meaning of a special form. While i
Basically i need to redefine the meaning of a special form. While i am
willing to change the name for things like ns to defpackage, i am not
willing to change the name of forms like apply and defn to achieve my
goals. Instead, i would like to redefine them for my own needs. Of
course, i will be us
14 matches
Mail list logo
