No, that's unfortunate. :(
Jonathan
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Brian Craft wrote:
> hipster presentation is not so great in archive: can't really see what
> he's doing.
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 1:55:08 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Fischer Friberg
> wrote:
>
>> Just found this: http://www
hipster presentation is not so great in archive: can't really see what he's
doing.
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 1:55:08 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Fischer Friberg
wrote:
>
> Just found this: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Laziness-Good-Bad-Ugly
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bria
Just found this: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Laziness-Good-Bad-Ugly
Jonathan
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Brian Craft wrote:
> Thanks for all the responses! This is great.
>
> b.c.
>
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:51:11 PM UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at
Thanks for all the responses! This is great.
b.c.
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:51:11 PM UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Brian Craft
> >
> wrote:
> > Is a lazy seq mostly about algorithmic clarity, and avoiding unnecessary
> > computation? So far I haven't
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Brian Craft wrote:
> Is a lazy seq mostly about algorithmic clarity, and avoiding unnecessary
> computation? So far I haven't run into any cases where I wouldn't realize
> the entire sequence, and it's always faster to do it up-front.
Here's a real world example
Sorry- I didn't mean for my post to come off sounding like the only reason
to use lazy eval is to skip computation. It's just *one* of the many
reasons.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Kurman Karabukaev wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Laziness (and first class functions) can help with code modularity,
Hi Brian,
Laziness (and first class functions) can help with code modularity, I would
suggest reading paper by John Hughes on the topic:
www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/whyfp90.pdf
Kurman
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Brian Craft wrote:
> I don't yet understand how laziness help
Example:
You want to find an element with a certain property in a list.
In a imperative language you can do:
function ...
for( ... loop over list)
if( ... current element has the property ...)
return the element
But in clojure we can do:
(first (filter has-the-property? the-lis
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
> On 23/10/12 19:57, Brian Hurt wrote:
>
>> Unless you don't need to do it at all.
>>
>
> nce... ;-)
>
>
I was actually serious. One of the advantages of lazy eval is that it lets
you delay deciding whether or not to do a computation unt
On 23/10/12 19:57, Brian Hurt wrote:
Unless you don't need to do it at all.
nce... ;-)
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moder
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
> On 23/10/12 19:38, Brian Craft wrote:
>
>> it's always faster to do it up-front.
>>
>
> it will always always be faster do it upfront...no way around that!
>
Unless you don't need to do it at all.
Brian
--
You received this message beca
On 23/10/12 19:38, Brian Craft wrote:
it's always faster to do it up-front.
it will always always be faster do it upfront...no way around that!
Clojure offers both worlds...be lazy when designing APIs or dealing
with big-data that don't fit to memory and be greedy when you want petal
to the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Brian Craft wrote:
> I don't yet understand how laziness helps. Can anyone point me to a
> reference?
all of haskell? ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@
13 matches
Mail list logo
