On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
(defn match [prev-char next-char]
(cond = prev-char
\( (= next-char \))
\[ (= next-char \])
true false))
It looks like you intended condp here instead of cond.
Your test works as expected if you make that change. However, there's
a
Hi again,
Am 02.07.2009 um 19:52 schrieb Meikel Brandmeyer:
(defn match [prev-char next-char]
(cond = prev-char
Typo: you mean cond*p* instead of cond.
\( (= next-char \))
\[ (= next-char \])
true false))
And BTW: the true shouldn't be there. If there
is an odd number of clauses, th
Hi,
Am 02.07.2009 um 19:48 schrieb Mark Volkmann:
(defn match [prev-char next-char]
(cond = prev-char
Typo: you mean cond*p* instead of cond.
\( (= next-char \))
\[ (= next-char \])
true false))
Sincerely
Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
