Re: traversing amazonica (or other nested data) results

2014-03-12 Thread Michael Cohen
" I get a typical clojure-y set of data fairly deeply nested data structures that I have yet to master with respect to traversing using basic clojure operations" You get an arbitrarily nested Clojure, not Clojure-y, data structure precisely because those maps, lists, and sets suffice in 99% of

Re: traversing amazonica (or other nested data) results

2014-03-12 Thread Sam Halicke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dave Tenny wrote: > If I do something like a describe-instances call in amazonica, I get > a typical clojure-y set of data fairly deeply nested data structures > that I have yet to master with respect to traversing using basic > clojure operations