Re: tools.trace (was Re: trace-forms macro on the clojure mailing list)

2011-09-27 Thread Sean Corfield
Thank you Luc! On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Luc Prefontaine wrote: > First shot of tools.trace is now available on github: > > http://github.com/clojure/tools.trace > > As for the traceforms macro, you will notice that when an exception is > trapped, I recompose > an new exception with the

tools.trace (was Re: trace-forms macro on the clojure mailing list)

2011-09-27 Thread Luc Prefontaine
Hi, First shot of tools.trace is now available on github: http://github.com/clojure/tools.trace As for the traceforms macro, you will notice that when an exception is trapped, I recompose an new exception with the necessary form traceback information instead of using print. The main reason is

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-27 Thread Luc Prefontaine
Fine, I merged the new version and I will add a couple of tests related to these changes. Luc On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:46:12 +0200 Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote: > I looked at it today and have updated the macro. > (same gist: https://gist.github.com/1209498) > > Additions: > It detects if a f

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-27 Thread Michał Marczyk
On 26 September 2011 18:46, Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote: > To Marczyk: > Sure, where to? Great, thanks! The relevant details are available on this page: http://clojure.org/contributing There's a one-page form to print out, sign and send off to Rich by snail mail. Once it's processed, your n

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-26 Thread Jonathan Fischer Friberg
I looked at it today and have updated the macro. (same gist: https://gist.github.com/1209498) Additions: It detects if a form contains (recur ...), and if it does, the form isn't wrapped in (try ...). trace vectors, maps, and sets. trace (fn* ...) & (new ...) --- The code feels a bit "thrown t

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-24 Thread Michał Marczyk
Oh, that's a nice idea! Definitely looks like a worthy addition to the trace lib. I believe the process around contributions to contrib involves a CA, though; Jonathan: do you have one in place? Any chance you might be convinced to submit one if not? :-) Sincerely, Michał -- You received this m

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-24 Thread Luc Prefontaine
Fine, I will have a closer look at the issues you mentioned. I'll repost here when the code is available so you can have a look at it. Luc On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:33:47 +0200 Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote: > > > > I am moving the trace contrib stuff to 1.3. I would like to include > > your trac

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-24 Thread Jonathan Fischer Friberg
> > I am moving the trace contrib stuff to 1.3. I would like to include your > trace-forms > macro in it. Feeling ok with this ? Comments ? > Sounds good to me. After all, I sent it to this list so that others could make use of it! When it comes to issues, in 1.3 it's not allowed to recur across

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-23 Thread Luc Prefontaine
Hi Jonathan, I am moving the trace contrib stuff to 1.3. I would like to include your trace-forms macro in it. Feeling ok with this ? Comments ? The issues you underlined are not runtime errors, they are compilation errors. There's not much you can do to trap these. The macro is still valuable

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-14 Thread Jonathan Fischer Friberg
It was tested with 1.2.1 Jonathan On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Sergey Didenko wrote: > Looks interesting. Did you use it with Clojure 1.3 or earlier? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to c

Re: trace-forms macro

2011-09-14 Thread Sergey Didenko
Looks interesting. Did you use it with Clojure 1.3 or earlier? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your