Henrik,
The reason for <> was that when at Akamai we had the idea to create a macro
of this kind, we were aware of already established strong opinions for and
against the idea of a threading macro with a specifiable position, by some
in the Clojure community. Stephen Compall had been reading Sche
Thank you guys, I think "as->" does more or less what I wanted, so my
example could be rewritten to:
(defn csv-line->sql-line [table, line]
(as-> % line
(str % " ")
(str/split % separator)
(map csv-field->sql-field %)
(str/join ", " %)
(str/replace string
You can find this functionality in the Swiss Arrows library
here: https://github.com/rplevy/swiss-arrows
My first thought was that using the % symbol seems cleaner than the <> of
Swiss Arrows. Thinking about it though, wouldn't overloading the % create
trouble when you do want to use the litera
It also does not really care whether or not it is inside a ->, it just
reads nicer when it is.
(as-> 4 x (+ x 2) (* x 7)
should return 42, although I can't check on my phone.
On Saturday, 15 November 2014, Bronsa wrote:
> Looks like I've been too fast in my reply, looking at the docstring I
>
Looks like I've been too fast in my reply, looking at the docstring I
see that I'm wrong and you're right. I didn't realize as-> could take
more than one "body"
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Nicola Mometto wrote:
>
> as-> only binds the specified expression rather than each result in step
> an
as-> only binds the specified expression rather than each result in step
and only works from within ->
Timothy Baldridge writes:
> That was added to clojure.core in 1.6 and is known as "as->"
> https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/as-%3E
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Krzysiek Herod
>
That was added to clojure.core in 1.6 and is known as "as->"
https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/as-%3E
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Krzysiek Herod
wrote:
> Guys, what do you think about new thread macro (I would call it thread-any
> and represent it as "%>"), that would require you to al
