Re: thinking parallel programming

2011-01-16 Thread Tim Daly
Excellent. I am taking notes on Steele's talk and adding them to the CiSP parallel section. In Clojure it might be possible to dynamically change the number of processes. With the bit-partition idea is might even be convenient. There was some discussion about this topic after David Liebke's

Re: thinking parallel programming

2011-01-16 Thread Alex Miller
There was some discussion about this topic after David Liebke's talk at the conj about the prototype fork/join filter/map/etc work that Rich did. The talk isn't out on video yet but slides are here: http://incanter.org/downloads/fjclj.pdf and I wrote up some of these notes here: http://tech.pured

Re: thinking parallel programming

2011-01-16 Thread Tim Daly
Steele is advocating binaries trees as an way of doing parallel computation. I think that this idea is reasonable but might be more effectively applied in Clojure. The idea of "binary" could be expanded in a very simple way to use log32 instead which is a natural mapping to the Clojure data stru

Re: thinking parallel programming

2011-01-16 Thread Ken Wesson
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Benny Tsai wrote: > In the Hacker News discussion about that talk, someone posted a link > to another talk by Guy Steele on the same topic: > > http://vimeo.com/6624203 > > ... where he covers the material in somewhat greater depth (the > downside being that by the

Re: thinking parallel programming

2011-01-15 Thread Benny Tsai
In the Hacker News discussion about that talk, someone posted a link to another talk by Guy Steele on the same topic: http://vimeo.com/6624203 ... where he covers the material in somewhat greater depth (the downside being that by the 30-minute mark, I was struggling to keep up with the flow of id