David you are a genious!!! thank you thank you very much!!! one of my
dependencies was pulling in opennlp/tools 1.5.0 which is a 2 year old jar!!!
added :exclusions and now I'm back in the game
If you're in Manchester Uk I'm buying beer... :)
Jim
On 12/03/13 14:49, David Powell wrote:
It lo
that is a reasonable thought indeed but it is extremely unlikely that
something like this is happening...the version of opennlp I'm using is
my own home-brewed one which I've manually installed in my local-repo
for sometime now...in my project.clj the dependency looks like this:
[experiment/ex
It looks like:
public String[] tag(String[] sentence, Object[] additionaContext);
wasn't originally present in the API, and was added in:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/opennlp/trunk/opennlp-tools/src/main/java/opennlp/tools/postag/POSTaggerME.java?r1=1245855&r2=1294177
It sounds like you might h
On 12/03/13 14:31, Marko Topolnik wrote:
What explains the occurrence of these extra signatures that you don't
mention above? It's hard to answer without having the full picture.
they are deprecated...there are 5 .tag() overloads in total. 2 of them
are deprecated (the one accepting List and t
What explains the occurrence of these extra signatures that you don't
mention above? It's hard to answer without having the full picture.
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 2:52:19 PM UTC+1, Jim foo.bar wrote:
>
> Ok I investigated a bit further and I found some seriously weird
> stuff...I'm gonna need
Ok I investigated a bit further and I found some seriously weird
stuff...I'm gonna need the help of a java expert here:
(pprint (.getMethods (.getClass opennlp-pos))) ;;notice that the method
I'm trying to call *doesn't exist according to this*
[#opennlp.tools.postag.POSTaggerME.trai
