Re: spec docs

2017-04-03 Thread Alex Miller
Either an issue or a PR on the clojure-site repo is best for the site. On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 6:21:57 PM UTC-5, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: >> >>> For clojure.org, the sou

Re: spec docs

2017-04-03 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > >> For clojure.org, the source is on GitHub, and you can submit a Pull >> Request (as long as you have a CA on file I believe?). The clojure.spec >> Guide page is: >> >> >> >>

Re: spec docs

2017-04-03 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > For clojure.org, the source is on GitHub, and you can submit a Pull > Request (as long as you have a CA on file I believe?). The clojure.spec > Guide page is: > > > > https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site/blob/master/ > cont

Re: spec docs

2017-04-03 Thread Sean Corfield
For clojure.org, the source is on GitHub, and you can submit a Pull Request (as long as you have a CA on file I believe?). The clojure.spec Guide page is:     https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site/blob/master/content/guides/spec.adoc You could draft a PR for an enhancement t