On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Stuart Halloway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Duh. Thanks, and I will be adding that to the sequences chapter. :-/
>
> Stuart
You're welcome -- looking forward to the book!
Best,
Graham
>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Stuart Halloway
>> <[EMAIL PROTECT
Duh. Thanks, and I will be adding that to the sequences chapter. :-/
Stuart
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Stuart Halloway
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> (1) Is there a simpler way to define pairwise, which takes an
>> existing
>> sequence and then returns its items a pair at a time?
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Stuart Halloway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (1) Is there a simpler way to define pairwise, which takes an existing
> sequence and then returns its items a pair at a time?
>
> (defn pairwise [& seq]
> (map vector (take-nth 2 seq) (take-nth 2 (rest seq
The b
