On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Jason wrote:
> How about
>
> (%->
> starting-value
> (foo 3 %)
> (bar % arg2 arg3))
>
> This combines the standard shorthand argument form from the inline
> function with the threading. I also like be because the '%' stands
> out.
And this also presum
I wanted to see how long this thread would go before someone linked to
the old stuff. :-)
Despite turning up repeatedly, the issue has never been put to bed. I
suspect it is the name. There has been no consensus, as this thread
demonstrates. I vote for one I haven't seen yet. `=>`. It's two
charac
Hi,
Am 08.02.2011 um 22:11 schrieb B Smith-Mannschott:
> Ah. Indeed. And Mark Fredrickson's "let->" is equivalent to my
> thread-with macro. I even considered the name let->. I guess there's
> no wheel that can't be reinvented. ;-)
Yeah. Once per year or so. ;)
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You receive
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 22:05, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Ah. A classic:
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852
>
> Some more names in this old thread.
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel
Ah. Indeed. And Mark Fredrickson's "let->" is equivalent to my
th
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 16:36, Jason wrote:
> How about
>
> (%->
> starting-value
> (foo 3 %)
> (bar % arg2 arg3))
>
> This combines the standard shorthand argument form from the inline
> function with the threading. I also like be because the '%' stands
> out.
This, or something very
Ah. A classic:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852
Some more names in this old thread.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to c
How about
(%->
starting-value
(foo 3 %)
(bar % arg2 arg3))
This combines the standard shorthand argument form from the inline
function with the threading. I also like be because the '%' stands
out.
On Feb 4, 3:05 pm, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> Clojure's threading macros -> a
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:14, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> I considered that, but decided against it because vector is the
> conventional syntax for variable bindings in Clojure (let, fn,
> defrecord, ...) Once I'd decided to do that, it became clear that the
> first of the forms would become the
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 00:19, Michael Ossareh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:05, B Smith-Mannschott
> wrote:
>>
>> I came up with this macro, but I'm unsure what to call it:
>>
>> (defmacro thread-let [[varname init-expression :as binding] & expressions]
>> {:pre [(symbol? varname)
>>
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:05:39 -0500, B Smith-Mannschott
wrote:
What should I name this thing? I'm concerned that "thread" is
confusing due to its dual meaning. let seems in line with clojure
conventions.
(thread-let [x ...] ...)
(thread-with [x ...] ...)
(thread-through [x ...] ...)
(let-> [x
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:05, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> I came up with this macro, but I'm unsure what to call it:
>
> (defmacro thread-let [[varname init-expression :as binding] & expressions]
> {:pre [(symbol? varname)
> (not (namespace varname))
> (vector? binding)
>
Missing some parens there. Should be (->> (take 2)), of course.
On Feb 4, 12:53 pm, Alan wrote:
> Another solution, which is not especially satisfying but is worth
> considering, is to use the most-common thread style at the top level,
> and interweave some exceptions for the less-common style.
>
Another solution, which is not especially satisfying but is worth
considering, is to use the most-common thread style at the top level,
and interweave some exceptions for the less-common style.
(-> 10
range 20
(->> take 2))
or
(->> 10
(#(range % 20))
(take 2))
On Feb 4, 12:05 pm
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:05 PM, B Smith-Mannschott
wrote:
> (defmacro thread-let [[varname init-expression :as binding] & expressions]
> {:pre [(symbol? varname)
> (not (namespace varname))
> (vector? binding)
> (= 2 (count binding))]}
> `(let [~@(interleave (repeat varna
14 matches
Mail list logo
