Alan,
The macro is great (output could use a bit of formatting for readability,
but, hey, I'm not complaining). Thank you very much.
Tuba
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Alan Malloy wrote:
> On Jul 28, 8:11 pm, Resty Cena wrote:
> > Hi, Masanori,
> > Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using L
On Jul 28, 8:11 pm, Resty Cena wrote:
> Hi, Masanori,
> Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using Laurent's 'manual way' for now.
> I'll look at Alan's and Laurent's more concise solution in a few days. The
> "manual way" is easy to debug as all I have to do is println the
> intermediate results.
Hi, Masanori,
Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using Laurent's 'manual way' for now.
I'll look at Alan's and Laurent's more concise solution in a few days. The
"manual way" is easy to debug as all I have to do is println the
intermediate results.
Thanks.
Tuba
2011/7/28 OGINO Masanori
> Lauren
Laurent's way and Alan's way have different surfaces, but same mean.
(-> word fix-ou fix-ize)
(fix-ize (fix-ou word))
You can check it using clojure.walk/macroexpand-all.
user=> (macroexpand-all '(-> "labour" fix-ou fix-ize))
(fix-ize (fix-ou "labour"))
Indeed you can choose only one way, I sug
Hi, Laurent,
Your suggestion of manually piping intermediate results works. Thank you
very much!
Tuba
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/28 Tuba Lambanog
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
>> change the v
Hi, Alan,
I can see that your suggestion will work. The key, as I understand it, is
the embedding of functions, thus:
(fix-ize (fix-ou word)))
which is indeed a Lisp-y way of doing things. It seems imperatively I miss
elegant one-liners such as this.
I'm right now close to getting Laurent's ap
Hi, Thorsten,
Yes, you're right, once inside a function, the function is already being
applied. I mean that within the function, there's a test for whether the
input variable needs to be changed or not. Sort of vacuous application if
conditions are not met.
Yes, an enriched facility for pattern m
On Jul 28, 12:22 pm, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 06:34 PM, Tuba Lambanog wrote:
>
> > The determination of whether a called function will apply is left as a
> > responsibility of the function itself, rather than the calling
> > function. The motivation is that a function may be called fr
On 07/28/2011 06:34 PM, Tuba Lambanog wrote:
The determination of whether a called function will apply is left as a
responsibility of the function itself, rather than the calling
function. The motivation is that a function may be called from a
number of places. Perhaps there's a better way?
Th
Hi, Thorsten,
<<
Why, if that is the case at
> all, do you want to pass an argument through functions that do not work
> with it?
>>
The determination of whether a called function will apply is left as a
responsibility of the function itself, rather than the calling
function. The motivation is tha
I'm trying to write a spelling 'standardizer' for a language that has
no standardized spelling. There are about 25 spelling rules, and a few
more may be added. . The input words, streamed one at a time from a
text file, go through these rules, and may change if conditions are
met. To take English e
On 07/28/2011 11:29 AM, Tuba Lambanog wrote:
I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
pseudo-code of what I'm doing.
I think you s
Hi,
2011/7/28 Tuba Lambanog
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
> change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
> uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
> pseudo-code of what I'm doing.
>
> (defn pro
http://clojure.org/state may help you to know Clojure's "value".
; AFAIK Java's string is also immutable...isn't it?
--
Name: OGINO Masanori (荻野 雅紀)
E-mail: masanori.og...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this gr
> I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
> change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
> uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
> pseudo-code of what I'm doing.
>
> (defn process-1 [s]
> ; change value of s then retu
15 matches
Mail list logo
