Thanks everyone. Makes perfect sense.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscri
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Sookocheff
wrote:
> Hi, I'm going through some Scheme code to learn Clojure. I defined a
> function
>
> rember
>
> as
>
>
> (defn rember [atom l]
> (loop [a atom lat l]
> (cond
> (empty? lat) `()
> (= (first lat)
> Is the call to recur not in tail position here?
>
>
No, because of (cons (first lat) (recur a (rest lat))). You cons (first lat)
after you call (recur ...). That is why (recur ...) is not in tail
position.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloju