And array-get seems to be aget by now.
a.
Jarkko Oranen schrieb:
> On Mar 20, 1:52 pm, Glen Rubin wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I am working through the problems on project euler. On question
> > number 11 (http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problems&id=11),
> > I was unable to come up wit
On Mar 20, 1:52 pm, Glen Rubin wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am working through the problems on project euler. On question
> number 11 (http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problems&id=11),
> I was unable to come up with a solution, so I cheated and looked at
> some other people's answer's here:
Hi Glen,
it's lazy-seq now.
Regards, alux
Glen Rubin schrieb:
> Hey all,
>
> I am working through the problems on project euler. On question
> number 11 (http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problems&id=11),
> I was unable to come up with a solution, so I cheated and looked at
> some other
Yeah, this makes perfect sense on second thought.
I still think this should be emphasised more, somewhere. On every
introduction to closure you will find, you're told to use the svn
version. So maybe there should be a big remainder on the api docs page
saying "This is not the doc for the SVN vers
the api doc documents the latest release of clojure, which is the
pre-lazy release from back in december I believe.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Notfonk wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> i'm not sure this is the right place to post that
>
> Could you please remove lazy-cons from the api doc ? I'm a newbie
