I'd love for that to happen—either error-kit support in test-is or
test-is support in error-kit. clojure.contrib libraries should be able
to use each other with no worries, since they'll be installed together
just about always.
On May 17, 12:52 am, Dan Larkin wrote:
> Sorry for the necro, but I
Sorry for the necro, but I just started using error-kit and read this
thread for the first time today.
Both error-kit (errors no longer inherit from *error* AFAICT) and test-
is (the report function syntax) have changed since David last posted a
working function, so I've updated it work with
On Feb 16, 12:13 pm, David Nolen wrote:
> test-is + error-kit is a great combo.
Let me know if I can answer any questions about test-is, but you seem
to have it well in hand. :)
-Stuart Sierra
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM, David Nolen wrote:
>
> I believe handle does the isa? check on the error type, correct?
Right.
> If so then this will allow inherited error types to pass the test.
Sounds good!
--Chouser
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
(defmethod assert-expr 'raised? [msg [_ error-type & body :as form]]
(let [error-name (qualify-sym error-type)]
`(with-handler
(do
~...@body
(report :fail ~msg '~form ~(str error-name " not raised.")))
(handle ~error-type {:as err#}
(report :pass ~msg '~for
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:50 AM, David Nolen wrote:
>
>> I don't quite understand why you got through all that work to get
>> error-str -- isn't it just (str (qualify-sym error-type))?
>>
>> ...and since you then use it only as an arg to 'symbol' or 'str', you
>> could just use the symbol itself
> I don't quite understand why you got through all that work to get
> error-str -- isn't it just (str (qualify-sym error-type))?
>
> ...and since you then use it only as an arg to 'symbol' or 'str', you
> could just use the symbol itself instead of converting it to a string
> and back.
>
If I brin
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:25 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> (defmethod assert-expr 'raised? [msg form]
> (let [error-type (second form)
> error-meta (meta (find-var (qualify-sym error-type)))
> error-str (str (ns-name (:ns error-meta)) "/" (:name error-meta))
> body (rrest form)]
Heh not macro, I meant multimethod.
Here is the macro that seems to work, any improvements much appreciated ;)
> This fails when no error is raised, when the wrong error type is raised, and
> I believe it's captures errors which are derived but not the exact error (is
> this a weird behavior?). Y
(defmethod assert-expr 'raised? [msg form]
(let [error-type (second form)
error-meta (meta (find-var (qualify-sym error-type)))
error-str (str (ns-name (:ns error-meta)) "/" (:name error-meta))
body (rrest form)]
`(with-handler
(do
~...@body
(report :fail ~msg
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:06 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> I've been attempting to combine error-kit and test-is, but getting the
> relation between assert-expr form in test-is and the handle form in
> error-kit is a bit tricky. Looking at the test-is thrown? example and
> Chouser's error-kit post on
11 matches
Mail list logo
