> Spaghetti code ?
most definitely. use it a lot and you'll almost certainly end up with
a "big ball of mud".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new mem
On Apr 24, 3:33 am, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:17 AM, George Jahad
>
> Is there a reason for all the conversion to string and back?
severe lack of "hammock driven development"?
the "clojure.core" is also redundant within syntax-quote, making it:
(defmacro remote-declare [n]
2011/4/24 George Jahad
> so as Rich mentions in hacker news, you can get declare to work in
> other namespaces which does convert the circular dependencies issue
> from a compile time problem to a potential run-time one.
>
> The definition is pretty much what you would expect:
>
> (defmacro remot
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:17 AM, George Jahad
wrote:
> so as Rich mentions in hacker news, you can get declare to work in
> other namespaces which does convert the circular dependencies issue
> from a compile time problem to a potential run-time one.
>
> The definition is pretty much what you woul
