Nicolás Berger writes:
Hi Nicolás,
>> I've simplified the code a bit so that I don't need the `cconso` >
>> relation.
>
> That's great. It's easier to understand this way. To simplify a tiny
> bit more, the `nf` lvar can also be removed: it's unified with `f`, so
> f can be used instead of nf in
Hi Tassilo,
> I've simplified the code a bit so that I don't need the `cconso` > relation.
That's great. It's easier to understand this way. To simplify a tiny
bit more, the `nf` lvar can also be removed: it's unified with `f`, so
f can be used instead of nf in `(conso nf nr nl)`
> Ok, and now t
Nicolás Berger writes:
Hi Nicolás,
> Sounds interesting :). I hope I get some time to take a look into it
> soon.
I appreciate your feedback!
> In the meantime, have you tried playing with the log and trace
> "goals"? I mean log, trace-s and trace-lvar. They might be of help
> in trying to d
Hi,
Sounds interesting :). I hope I get some time to take a look into it soon.
In the meantime, have you tried playing with the log and trace "goals"? I
mean log, trace-s and trace-lvar. They might be of help in trying to
discover where it's going that makes it hang.
El 29/07/2015 11:40, "Tassilo
