It's definitely one of the less intuitive aspects of dealing with core.cache
but it bites you once (or twice!) and you internalize it and kinda move on :)
Sean
On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:57 PM, dan.stone16...@gmail.com wrote:
> In case anyone was wondering I worked out what was going on and it makes
In case anyone was wondering I worked out what was going on and it makes
perfect sense. I was being stupid :)
If you ask for a value via 'lookup' expired values will not be returned at
this point as 'has?' is called internally.
I made a quick and dirty library to reflect the behaviour I want f
