On Oct 3, 5:21 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. If it is important to get access bounded by the subvector's N you
> can just call vec on it, at a one-time O(subvecN) cost.
>
> It is important to note that for vectors that are created by vec (and
> literals) that have never been up
On Oct 3, 10:59 am, Cesare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 4:42 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 3, 10:12 am, Cesare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subvectors can be created in constant time because they copy nothing
> > and share structure with the original. So, th
On Oct 3, 4:42 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 10:12 am, Cesare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subvectors can be created in constant time because they copy nothing
> and share structure with the original. So, they are effectively views
> on the original vector, and share its a
On Oct 3, 10:12 am, Cesare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm reading the Clojure documentation and there is something I don't
> understand about vector functions.
>
> "Vectors support access to items by index in log32N hops"
>
> but this seems in contrast with the fact that 'subvec' i
