Oh sorry, I should have looked at the newest issues first.
I don't think the tickets are dupes, because yours calls for enabling java
static fields for case constants.
Mine just wants to add language stating how case can be used right now.
IMO enabling case constants is at odds with current doc l
Oops, I already filed http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1367. Should
probably link/mark as dupe - I don't appear to be able to do anything other
than comment.
Adam
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
wrote:
> Created: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1368
>
>
> 2014-0
Created: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1368
2014-03-01 2:58 GMT+01:00 Alex Miller :
> I would appreciate a jira enhancement ticket for this.
>
> Alex
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email
I would appreciate a jira enhancement ticket for this.
Alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
fi
Anyone who has a good working example of this can add it to
clojuredocs.orgin a few minutes, if they are so inclined:
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/case
I know that within 5 seconds of reading this one or more people will
complain that the site is out of date. It is true t
2014-02-28 17:21 GMT+01:00 Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant <
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com>:
> (defmacro motion-case [...]
> `(case ..
> ~MotionEvent/ACTION_POINTER_DOWN ...
> ~MotionEvent/ACTION_UP ...
> ))
>
That's a neat trick! Didn't know case could do this.
Wouldn't it be great to menti
That works perfectly, thanks!
It does feel like it should just work as a normal case statement though,
where the value is static final, and warn if it isn't. Is there a good
reason this shouldn't be supported by the case statement that anyone can
think of? Worth filing an enhancement request on cl
IMO that would needlessly complicate an otherwise simple construct,
especially since a simple macro can endlessly customise it.
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Adam Clements wrote:
> That works perfectly, thanks!
>
> It does feel like it should just work as a normal case statem
I'm not 100% sure if this works, but have you tried writing a macro that
gets the
Java field value, and inserting into the case statement?
(defmacro motion-case [...]
`(case ..
~MotionEvent/ACTION_POINTER_DOWN ...
~ MotionEvent/ACTION_UP ...
))
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Adam Clem
